Saturday, July 09, 2005

Paradigm Shift

There are a number of reasons why, at this point in my life, I feel the need to once again articulate my unshakeable belief in the value of the First Amendment. The Kat got busted for being less-than-totally-anonymous on her blog at work, and, I assume, underwent some unfortunate, blustering, and no doubt angry Administrative Disciplinary Action before moving her blog to a new space and scrubbing it so hard it reflects my bearded image back to me as I read it. Having recently undergone the same kind of nerve-racking ambush at my previous job for a similar (if not totally analogous) issue, I'd have to say that I sympathize deeply. People all over the country are getting busted at work for using their computers in a way that their employers had not intended... and I think I know why.

People our age -- yes, I am once again speaking of The Wandering Generation as an "us" and the people who employ us from Generation X or above as a "them" -- grew up with technology not only at our fingertips, but also in our schools, on our desks, and, now, in our coffee shops. We tend to see computers as a Complete Package, a Complete Package that offers not only work productivity, but also entertainment, excitement, and, often enough, a good way to get into harmless mischief. The people who hire us and who spend time writing acceptable use policies don't think about computers in quite this way. It's similar, but it's not the same. They tend to see computers as having separate identities depending on their context: a computer in an office is for work, a computer at home is for work, a computer at the library is for anonymously surfing for porn. Just kidding on that last one.

Normally, this sort of perception-shift isn't really a problem, but what if, like The Kat, it's your own computer that you've brought with you to a work environment? Is it a Work Computer all the time? What about when you're not on the clock? Or what about G-Money's company-issued laptop? This one's a little less gray, but still, when it's at home, is it still a Work Computer? Or what about smaller things, issued by a school district and colored purple, which are capable of holding Word documents and transported back and forth from home to school? When I plugged my Jump Drive into my home desktop, did that turn my Home Computer into a Work Computer? If you're a Them who thinks that a computer's function is based on physical context, then the answer to the first question is yes, the answer to the second is definitely, and the answer to the third is absolutely. But if you're an Us, then the answers are maybe, maybe, and maybe.

The plain truth is this: since The Kat wasn't being at all offensive or exposing proprietary information, they should have left her alone. A parent gets offended... well... I guess I have to say that one of the problems with most of the Thems in this society is not only that they're so easily offended, but also that they genuinely believe that they've somehow earned the right to go through life without ever being offended by anything. No wonder their children whine, cry, and scream at them while I'm trying to enjoy a quiet moment in every restaurant in town.

Maybe I'm being foolishly self-centered when I point out that it's not Us who need to revise our notions of what is and is not appropriate at work, but rather that They need to better accommodate Us. Maybe. But maybe not.

2 Comments:

Blogger Madame Flamingo said...

Definitely not. Parents these days are wimpy and are consistently being "offended" by things that their children wouldn't (or shouldn't) even blink an eye at. Also, there's no need for this kind of situation to happen. Whatever happened to people being too embarrassed about having looked into your private things to "discipline" you over it? I speak here more of the purple doo-hicky situation, because I don't know too much about The Kat's situation. But I will say that anyone who ever wants to discuss or (better yet) complain about how useless and misdirected the parents of today are, I am ready to go.

8:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Meow. Luckily, this person wasn't reprimanded for blogging at work; in fact, that wasn't even brought up. The unlucky party heard two stories:

1) A parent had found said blog and complained about certain said things.
2) In the confrontation with "tb" (ask me personally what this means if you can't figure it out), the parent wasn't even mentioned. In fact, the blog was only eluded to and never directly mentioned. Instead, "tb" had been googling something else and found it and read an entry about certain job frustrations dealing with "tb".

The confronter said yes there is a freedom of speech; one can go home and say whatever one wants to their friends about any and everything. However, when one chooses to put things in a public area (blog), one has to deal with whatever consequences. The amendment allows one to say whatever one's heart desires, but it doesn't protect one from the consequences.

The confrontee was warned, or given advice perhaps, to be careful because things can hurt one's self in the long run.

So, now what do you think? I know that the unlucky person is uber paranoid to mention anything personal in the blog now. How far do you think this person can go? Mention of places? People? What?!?!?!

7:26 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home